These days you don't suffer from choice if you're buying a new one CPU desktop. Far from there! And that's true whether you buy a new processor that you'll use for PC gaming, a processor filled with cores for fast content creation or media crunching, or a silicon wafer that gets it all done. In mid-2019, thanks to AMD, the desktop processor market had a tough restart with the launch of the company's 7-nanometer Ryzen desktop processors (more on them in a bit), and now you're going to get more cores (and more threads) for your CPU money than ever before. The biggest rival Intel, meanwhile, the traditional leader in the field, has relaunched its mainstream line of desktop processors on a new basis.velle platform with more pep in 2020.
But how does this extra power - Intel or AMD - translate into results in PC gaming? It's complicated, and it varies from game to game, as well as by CPU and graphics card combination. Still, once you know the players in the chip market, their chip families, and some general characteristics, you can compare your budget to what you actually need. (For most buyers who aren't sports pros, it's actually easy to overbid.) Let's take a look at the processor landscape in early 2021, and then mess with each of the major chips. families.
The state of game processors in 2021
This Has been a wild ride in recent years in CPU space, and nowhere has this ride been more bumpy than in Intel's car. The company announced its efforts toto upgrade its line of desktop processors from the 14nm to 10nm lithography process , and meanwhile, AMD has overtaken Intel and upgraded its latest stack of consumer Ryzen chips (the ones without integrated graphics) to 7nm technology. Thi s allowed a major leap forward in terms of power and efficiency.
At the same time, in mid-2020, Intel introduced its new high-end consumer processors in the form of the 10th generation Core i9-10900K , the Core i7-10700K and the Core i5-10600K (as well as lower versions in each family, as well as lower end Core i3 and Pentium / Celeron chips). These high-end processors represent performance improvements for the computingMainstream icing, especially with additional processing threads supported in the middle of the stack. But when it comes to gaming, the benchmarks prove that in most games you'll get better, but not drastically, the in-game frame rates of these 10th gen chips compared to what you'd get with. an equivalent Intel 9th Generation Chip.
This story was much the same with AMD 's third generation Ryzen 3000 chips, just replaced by the fourth generation Ryzen 5000 chips at the end of 2020. The 3000 series architecture ' then new " Zen 2 ", based on the previously mentioned 7nm lithography, offers big improvements in terms of performance per watt and price, few of these processors released in the Ryzen 3000 range are objectively faster for gaming than theOur Intel counterparts to cost comparison. (That said, AMD continues to dominate Intel in most other factors, put apart from the flat- game results.) These Ryzen chips tend to have more addressable cores and threads for the same price. However, most games don't know how to take advantage of more than four cores at a time.
From a gaming standpoint, however, where things got interesting for the Ryzen family is at the bottom of its Ryzen 3000 stack, as well as its debut of the latest fourth generation of Ryzen 5000 series processors of Ryzen chips.
Let's start by discussing the low-end 3000 series chips: The Ryzen 3 3100 andthe Ryzen 3 3300X are both 2020, and they use a new kind of design of CCD (in short: how transistors are organized on the chip), which reduces the latency of the Ryzens of 2019. In a nutshell, the latency between the different dies on a chip extends the time it takes for the different parts of the processor to talk to each other. This increased time can result in lower frame rates, although this depends a lot on the game and its optimization. AMD claims this is all due to improved Zen 2 manufacturing yields and a better understanding of 7nm process technology.
The result of all these adjustments? Although it only costs $ 120, the four-core, eight-thread Ryzen 3 3300X matches very well the very expensive 12-thread six-core Ryzen 5 3600X in almost every game we've tested it in. And yes, that means it also beats just about anything Intel can offer for the same price. (We didn't test the very latest 10th Gen Intel Core i3s, but some early results from the web show that the Core i3-10100 at the same price shows no surprises.) With the launch of the Ryzen 3 3100 and the Ryzen 3 3300X, AMD has reduced the entry price of most players to get in on the action and in doing so also freed up a budget that can be transferred to your graphics card, giving budget gamers more power for the same expense.
But the company has never been content to rest on its laurels, and as such AMD has once again raised the bar with the launch of the Ryzen 5000 series. We have tested every chip in the stack. far tht sent it through our gaming benchmarks, and the results are very good for AMD.
While AMD has had issues with streaming its matrices across multiple CCDs in Zen 2 based chip options like the Ryzen 3 3600X, the "Zen 3 architecture "correct this. In chips like the Ryzen 5 5600X , AMD has streamlined the design, so incorporating eight cores into each individual CCD, more than any game could reasonably be expected to use at once (even for purely AI-based tasks like calculating enemy turns in the Civilization series). This has resulted in serious performance improvements in the games department, and it has also translated into increased productivity tasks as well as content creation in tandem.
Integrated or dedicated graphics
While more cores, higher clock speeds, and the latest chip architectures are all nice to have, choosing the best processor specifically for gaming isn't all about specs and base speeds. . Let's move on to some of the considerations to keep in mind when buying a gaming chip, before we dive into Families and our recent favorite picks.
Most people looking for a processor for PC gaming will use a dedicated graphics card with it. One s The average frame rates for a specific graphics card will vary within a given game when paired with different processors, and from platform to platform. As a general rule, however, the amount of influence attributable to the processor depends a lot on the resolution at which you run the game.
If you play dIn the mainstream (by far) the most common resolution, 1080p (or 1,920 by 1,080 pixels), or less than that, the variance can be substantial. This is because with many games, resolutions of 1080p or lower are much more dependent on the single-core frequency of your processor than the outright power of your GPU.
For gamers playing today at peak realistic resolution (4K, or 3840 by 2160 pixels), the reverse is true. The higher you go in resolution, the more the limiter is your video card, not your CPU. As a rule of thumb: Gamers playing at resolutions above 1080p should invest more in their GPU, while gamers playing exclusively at 1080p or less should. be careful to get a processor that has a higher single-core boost frequency, within the limits of the system budget.
Again une times, however: there are no relatives here. This largely varies depending on the game and the genre of game. You should also think about the type of games you plan to play. For example, performance in a game such as Call of Duty: Modern Warfare , with the latest additions ray tracing and DLSS will depend heavily on the type of graphics card you purchase. Games like Civilization VI , on the other hand, must yield a lot of troops, AI and math equations to work properly. Games like these rely a lot more on the processor than the GPU, and that's not limited to RTS or Strategy games, either.
To illustrate the variance involved, here is a quick round-up of some recent and new mainstream and high-end desktop processors (HEDTs).presentatives and a few selected game references to illustrate what we mean. We tested them all with a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti card, the main graphics card in our test bench, to level the playing field and get the video card out of the equation down to 4K resolution, where almost everything. the elevator is managed by the GPU rather than the CPU. Here are the results we have seen with mainstream processors ...
Games like CS: GO, as you can see, are more CPU sensitive than others. The faster the single-core frequency of your processor for CS: GO, the better your frame rates will be at resolutions where this sort of thing matters (for example, on a 240Hz monitor running at 1080p). Likewise, the more robust the processor, the faster your laps in Civilization VI will be processed. But the more robust your graphics card, the more beautiful your textures will be in Apex Legends and the more you will seelight rays rendered in games like Shadow of the Tomb Raider or Metro: Exodus. The features of the game, sometimes, can be as important as the hardware.
Now the illustrations above assume a reasonable or better video card paired with your CPU. You can certainly play games with the integrated graphics processor (IGP) which is built into mainstream processors from Intel and APUs from AMD (the company's handful of low-end chips that combine a processor and graphics on the die). But you'll be relegated to low settings and resolutions, and demanding modern titles often won't be playable at acceptable frame rates (typically 30fps or higher), even in well-optimized games like Fortnite.
It is also important to mention that most ofAMD Ryzen processors, low-end AMD Ryzen 3 and 5 chips (but not the Ryzen 3 3200G and target Ryzen 5 3400G APU) to the ultra-powerful AMD Ryzen Threadrippers and enthusiasts, lack integrated graphics. So with these options you will definitely need a dedicated graphics card.
The same goes for the Intel enthusiasts' Core X-Series platform: these chips must be paired with a video card. So be sure to choose an AMD "G " series processor or an Intel Core i3, Core i5, or Core i7 chip, if you don't want to purchase a graphics card. The latest generation processors on the Intel side will use a form of what Intel calls "HD Graphics" or "UHD Graphics" as integrated graphics silicon. (Intel UHD Graphics 630 is the standard in Intel chipslatest generation, and don't expect much for anything other than web gaming.) Important Note: Intel has introduced a subclass of processors in its consumer lines that have integrated graphics disabled. Their model numbers end in "F " (for example, Core i9-9900KF) and can save you a few bucks if you know you'll only ever use a dedicated video card with them.
If you're gaming on a very tight budget, without having the option of purchasing a video card, you might want to think of AMD's latest APUs ( "Picasso ") as the Ryzen 3 3200G or Ryzen 5 3400G, based on the Zen + microarchitecture. They combine the company's Ryzen processor cores with its current generation Vega 8 or 11 graphics silicon. Don't expect ard-level performance c-graphics, but the Vega graphics on these chips are as good as the in-CPU graphics sonot available at the moment. The lightweight graphics of these "G " chips may be sufficient for some gamers, but anyone serious about building or upgrading a PC capable of playing all types of games will want to provide for a separate, dedicated card.
In games, do more cores equal more power?
Technically, yes, but there is a catch. AMD has been around Intel for a few years in terms of cost per core, and for anyone who uses a lot of multi-threaded applications, this is a godsend. It wasn't that long ago that eight-core processors were out of the reach of most buyers, but now, thanks to the Ryzen revolution of recent years, the cap for what eight cores, 12 cores, and even 16 cores - the cost of consumer processors has dropped significantly.
This means that for users who usetheir desktops are used for creating gaming content, and AMD is often the best choice. For example, let's compare two of the best chips offered by AMD and Intel, Ryzen 9 5900X and Core i9-10900K , both around $ 500:
In most situations the Ryzen 9 5900X will be the best value here given the extra cores and addressable threads. (Even if you don 't do any content creation tasks now, that doesn't mean you won't at some point in the future.) Having more power for the same amount of money is rarely a good thing. bad thing.
In addition,there is one additional performance to take into account. The general trend, all things being equal, is that the more cores a processor has on its chip, the lower the single-core peak frequency will be. This is why (again in general, not always: see the launch of AMD Zen 3), Intel has the upper hand over relative frame rates for games in every approximate price range. With its current architectures, Intel isn't just about maximizing the number of cores and threads on a processor, and is focusing on the actual performance it can squeeze out of its boosted frequencies from the cores already there.
Currently, few games know how to take advantage of more than four cores at once. Although games like Grand Theft Auto V have been seen using six cores at the occasion, and Very specific titles like Civilization VI use all available cores while calculating AI turns, additional cores often stay idle during your gaming sessions, unless, for example, you are streaming your game to Twitch at the same time.
Take into account monitor resolution, refresh rate
Unless Whether you have a fancy, newer, gaming-specific LCD monitor (it will advertise very highrefresh rates on its bezel or box), it's safe to assume your LCD screen hits 60Hz. great for most games: it means you will be able to see frame rates up to 60 frames per second (fps).
Keep in mind, however, that if your graphics card and processor exceed this frame rate, your monitor will not actually display those extra frames. So there is no need to spend too much on your processor and your graphics card to get performance your monitor can't even deliver. With a regular LCD monitor, a consistently higher frame rate, but not too much above an average of 60 fps in your favorite games is the sweet spot.
Competitive and fast gamers, however, swear by their high-rate refresh. And hardware makers are increasingly improving their gaming with gaming-centric monitors, to the point that 'Asus has released a model that hits staggering 360Hz refresh rate . So if you have (or are considering purchasing) a gaming monitor with a refresh rate of 120Hz or higher, to really take advantage of it , you will have to spend more on a graphics card to push these extras frames.
And in some cases, you'll also need a beefier processor to keep up. This is because most highrefresh rate monitors have a native resolution of 1080p. Some highrefresh 1440p monitors that push above 165Hz have started to do the trick (the HP Omen 27 comes to mind), as well as 4K 144Hz displays like the Acer Predator XB3 for ultra-elite gamers. But 1080p is by far the heart of the market, and at 1080p gaming performance is more limited by the pro.only the graphics card, if you bought a card good enough for 1080p playback .
Right now, the refresh rate waypoints of highrefresh monitors above 60Hz that you can buy are 100Hz, 120Hz, 144Hz, 165Hz, 240Hz, and 360Hz. The latter really only is important for players who play titles such as CS: GO, Rainbow Six: Siege, League of Legends, or DOTA 2. But it never hurts to have more refresh overhead in. your pocket when the only thing standing between you and a clean kill is the number of screen updates per second.
The key point, however, is the question: " How much is too much? "If you have a regular 1080p, 60Hz, anda good graphics card enough to consistently push above 60fps, there's no point in hand-tweaking the small frame rate differences that similarly priced processors will offer. You won't see the benefits of frame rates beyond 60 fps. Only people with highrefresh rate monitors should reasonably be obsessed with the difference between, say, 140 fps and 160 fps, and even then only if they are involved in competitive esports.
In short, which processor you choose matters the most as you move down the resolution scale. All things being equal, at higher resolutions the graphics card sets the limits. At lower levels, the CPU can get more and more into the picture, and what is most important to you should always include considering which monitor you will be playing on as well.
Do you need PCI Express 4.0 to play your best?
If you've seen the brilliant new spec for "PCIe 4.0-ready " on the box of your new X570 or B550 motherboard purchased for an AMD gaming processor, you won't be blamed for thinking it's new technology you need now to stay competitive with the rest of the PC gaming world (and this sentiment isn't just about desktop PCs). When Sony's datasheet PS5 console was unveiled, many gamers went straight to CPU and GPU specs to see what the next generation of games might have in store. But one area that was initially ignored could end up being one of the most important: storage speeds.
For over a decade, major consoles have been storing games on sluggish hard drives based on platters that cannot stream that data from one game on the rest of the system averages around 100MB / s. While it might not sound worrisome, this bottleneck has proven to be a big deal for game developers, and that is why in many AAA titles today you will find your characters enter elevators, wait behind doors, or slowly advance their way through a squeeze in a path before reaching the next part of a level. The rest of the game just hasn't loaded to disc yet, and this painstakingly timed animation is a time killer that is the only thing standing between the player and a jumble of partially loaded textures.
This is all about to change with the advent of new consoles and the introduction of the PCI Express (PCIe) 4.0 bus into the mainstream, however. Some developers have hailed it as a new era for gaming when applied to storage, one that will make it much easier to build, load, and stream massive worlds into the player's world at speeds than hard drives. of yesteryear could never dream of.
Now, in early 2021, PCIe 4.0 storage is indeed a thing on desktop PCs, although specifically on AMD systems based on cutting edge chipsets (the X570 and B550 relevant to Ryzen, and Threadripper's TRX40.). Now, does that mean you need to rock your next gaming PC with a PCIe 4.0 compatible motherboard and compatible processor? A market where AMD currently benefits on its own? Not exactly .
Firstly, these load-time bottlenecks only apply to the Single player mode titles. To maintain a level playing field in a single online match, multiplayer games will load the entire map players are playing on, as well as all items included, before any given match begins. And while PCIe 4.0 drives will certainly load this data faster than hard drives, it ultimately becomes a bit of a "slowest camper" situation, in which the bear will only attack after everything has been done. the world will have loaded its assets onto their local machines.
Second, PCIe 4.0 as the basis of game development is still quite a ways away. It will be a fun selling point for systems likehas PS5, but their real-world implementation on consoles and PCs at a universal level is still, at the earliest, in a year, at least. Don't expect to see the "PCIe 4.0 Compliant SSD " as a list of minimum PC gaming requirements anytime soon.
How does this relate to game processors? As of early 2021, AMD processors, along with the mentioned chipsets, are the only mainstream processors that support PCIe 4.0. While some Intel Z490 platform motherboards for the 10th generation Intel chips would have PCIe 4.0 compatible parts installed (which could mean the nex generation of Intel processors might support PCIe 4.0), the current generation of chips does not support the protocol. PCIe 4.0 on mainstream Intel desktop platforms won't enter until 11th Gen Intel "Rocket Lake-S " processors expected in March 2021, which will run on new cardss mothers of the Z590 chipset (and lower chipsets).
So while it's never a bad idea to perpetuate your system if you have the cash, don't look for AMD 's PCIe 4.0 compatible cards like the platforms X570 and B550. you get extreme gains in convenient load times over what you would get on a current gen PCIe 3.0 card for Intel or AMD. It is the future, but it is not a major concern today, even for gamers.
Overclocking: Does this save money?
Some low budget gamers are trying to bridge the gap between their wallets and building their dreams is to overclock a cheaper processor to approach chip performance more expensive by one or two levels. .
Intel makes it easy to determine which of its processors are overclockable and whicharen't: just look for the "K" at the end of the model number, which indicates the processor is unlocked and ready for overclocking out of the box. As for AMD, almost all of its desktop processors released in recent years are overclockable to your liking (with good reason, of course).
But before you rush to get the cheapest processor possible with the expectation of gigahertz pumping up, consider a few things, in terms of price. First, there is the extra cooling that you will need. You won't want to overclock a processor while using the standard fan / heatsink combo that comes with it. These coolers are designed to run the processor at its regular clocks; anything over and you risk giving your PC heatstroke. (Rather, make it slow performance for its own safety, which is counterproductive.)
Aftermarket air coolers are relatively effective in keeping your CPU overclocked. cool, but they have limits (especially during summer months, if you live in a warm place, where there is hot air inside, hot air inside In general, expect to spend around $ 30 to $ 60 for a sufficiently powerful air cooler, depending on how high you plan to clock your processor.
For anyone who really wants to push their CPU to its relative limit, however, liquid cooling is the way to go; high-end chips from Intel and AMD demand it. But, with great cooling power, excellent cooling responsiveness ... wait, this is not the linee. Big sums of money, this is it.
The most basic liquid cooling setups can be relatively inexpensive, but most inexpensive installations aren't much more efficient than their similarly priced overhead counterparts, which means you go with more complicated installation for minimal gain. . Be prepared to spend $ 60 to $ 150 on an aftermarket closed-loop liquid cooling system powerful enough to keep an overclocked CPU cool.
Second, be aware that, at least in the case of Intel, the difference in cost between an overclockable and a non-overclockable processor can be noticeable. For example, the Core i7-10700K sells for $ 349 MSRP, while the Le Core i7-10700 standard is only $ 323 MSRP.
Bottom line: overclock in all safetyOf course, a high-end Intel processor, while that may seem like the cheapest way to get a better processor for your money, will cost you at least $ 70 more if you don't. t already have a compatible cooler. AMD overclocking may be slightly cheaper, depending on the chip in question, but you'll still have to fork out for the extra hardware (and maybe a bigger case, to fit a cooler's heatsink. liquid). So be sure to incorporate these costs into your construction budget before you pull the trigger.
Most of the time? The extra money you would spend on cooling equipment is simply better spent on the next stage processor. It 's safer and a lot less hassle.
2021 's CPU Families, Explained
To get started, we will help players to have an imagemore comprehensive of the pros and cons of each of today's key processor families. Below, we've put together a breakdown that lists exactly what each one brings to the proverbial board. If you want to know more about these different families of processors, go to our Global Best CPUs deep , which covers this topic in even more detail.
Intel 9th and 10th Generation Core
The 9th Core range generation ( "Coffee Lake- S ") works with LGA 1151 socket on motherboards with 300 series chipsets (do not confuse them with motherboards with the same 1151 socket but 100 and 200 series chipsets ), while the 10th generation Core line ( "Comet Lake-S ") works with the newCalf Z490 chipset (with others to follow) and LGA 1200 socket.
- Good choice for r gamers who primarily need the fastest frame rates.
- Solid value for money in the Core i7 family
- Integrated graphics supplied in all processors (except versions "F ")
- A confusing socketing protocol for chips Generation 9 may make buying on the motherboard difficult
- Only more expensive 'K' brand chips can be overclocked (and even then, not by many without good cooling equipment and expertise / patience)
- Intel Z490 platform (for 10th generation chips) does not offer revolutionary features in line with the cost adoption
- 9th and 10th generation high-end chips require aseparate and rugged cooling (no stock cooler) and rugged power supply
- Most 9th gen midrange chips do not support the Hyper -Threading (in other words, only one processing thread per core)
(Examples: see our reviews on Core i7-9700K , the Core i9-9900K , on Core i9-9900KS , on Core i5-10600K , and the Core i9-10900K .)
Intel Core X-Series
The latest Core X-Series chips, the Core i9 10000X-series, are also known by the code- Name " Cascade Lake-X "and use the socket LGA 2066. The same socket supports the previous generation "Skylake-X Refresh " or "Basin Falls " 9000X series processors.
- Intel 's Most Powerful Consumer Chips: Perfect for Gaming and Everything
- Perfect for gamers who stream simultaneously on Twitch or for gamers who also use their PCs as creative workstations
- Designed for SLI or CrossFireX setups with multiple video cards, and plenty of storage PCIe, with support for an increased number of processor-bound PCI Express lanes
- Hype for most gamers, both in terms of performance and price
- Thes motherboards on the required X299 chipset are expensive
- No integrated graphics
- No bundled stock coolers
(Examples: see our reviews on Core i9-9980XE Extreme Edition and Core i9-10980XE Extreme Edition .)
All first and second generation Ryzen processors ( "Summit Ridge " and "Pinnacle Ridge ") , as well as the current third generation ( "Matisse ") and fourth generation ( "Vermeer "), work on the AMD AM4 socket. Some older cards do not work with newer chips, and vice versa, so check the details before purchasing. But the continuite of socket AM4 is much larger than on the latest platforms from Intel.
- Solid value choice for most players who want to build their own system
- Zen 2 chips are the best values for gamers who don 't have a ton to spend
- All chips are unlocked for the game. 'overclocking
- Zen 3 chips are machines with record speed
- No - "G " Ryzen chips lack integrated graphics
(Examples: see our reviews on Ryzen 7 2700X , on Ryzen 3 3300X , on Ryzen 5 5600X , the Ryzen 7 5800X , on Ryzen 9 5900X , and the Ryzen 9 5950X .)
AMD Ryzen G Series
All Ryzen G processors (" Raven Ridge "2000G and " Picasso "3000G series) work on the AMD AM4 socket, like the do the regular Ryzen, but they require a motherboard with an appropriate video out port if you want to use the integrated graphics. Not all AM4 motherboards (especially high end cards) necessarily have integrated video outputs, so be sure to check before committing to any of these chips.
- Designed for players at psmall budget
- Has an integrated graphics processor (IGP)
- The best mainstream integrated graphics, if you can't not buy video card
- IGP not powerful enough for most gamers serious
- CPU performance is lower than Ryzen 3 and 5 CPUS equivalent without IGP
- Requires card motherboard with video output for IGP use, and not all AM4 cards have one
(Examples: see our reviews on Ryzen 3 2200G , the Ryzen 3 3200G and the Ryzen 5 3400G .)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper
First and second generation Threadrippers (" Whitehaven "and " Colfax ") work on motherboards with the X399 chipset and a socket called TR4. Newer Threadrippers (third generation "Castle Peak ") use a new TRX40 chipset and a socket called sTRX4.
- Suitable for gamers who are simultaneously streaming on Twitch or gamers who also use their PC as rugged creative workstations
- Lots of headroom to run additional apps at the same time as games
- Requires a high end aftermarket cooling solution, due to large die sizes; no stock cooler included
- Motherboards from AMD X399 chipsets and TRX40 are expensive
- Like the Intel Core X-Series, a far stretch for most single-board gamers
(Examples: see our reviews of the Ryzen Threadripper 2950X , on Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX , on Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X .)
So, which-processor should I buy for gaming?
Now that 's a lot to digest, we know that. Let's go over some common scenarios based on our previous discussions.
BUDGET BUYERS. If you intend to add a graphics carddedicated (and you relatively should, if you can), gaming performance (as opposed to pure content creation) is what matters most to you, and you've got around $ 100 to $ 150 in CPU spending , we recommend the AMD Ryzen 3300X , assuming you are looking for build a new PC or have an AM4 motherboard. If you can't afford a separate video card, the AMD Ryzen 5 3400G is the way to go, with the best built-in graphics around.
THOSE WHO HAVE INVESTED IN INTEL PLATFORMS. If you are a die-hard Intel and already own a 300- series, LGA 1151 motherboard, any 8000 or 9000 series compatible Intel Core i5 or i7 processor (for example, the Core i7-9700K ) should be fine for you, for at least a few years. (Core i9s are great chips too, but require liquid cooling.) Rather than upgrading to a new platform like the 10th Gen Core and an Intel Z490 motherboard (which means the added cost of a new motherboard), we recommend that you invest that money in a card more powerful graphics instead.
H IGH-REFRESH GAMING BEFORE EVERYTHING. If cost isn 't your main concern and you want to be sure to get the get the most out of your card at 1080p with a highrefresh rate monitor, the Intel Core i9-10900K with a new motherboard Z490 offers the best Intel has to offer with a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti graphics card that we have seen (apart fromfrom the Core i9-9900KS , which is hard to find these days).
Meanwhile, our testing shows that the $ 449 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X offers even better performance than the $ 549 (street) Core i9-10900K at 1080p. However, unlike the Core i9-10900K, which requires a whole new platform upgrade, the 5800X remains compatible with AMD's venerable AM4 Socket. Those with older motherboards will want to check they have a BIOS that supports 5000 series chips before purchasing, but on platform compatibility (and the price savings that go with it). ), AMD simply cannot be beat.
GAME IN PROGRESS OF CONTENT CREATION. And if you're a gamer who regularly creates CPU-hungry content on the side, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 9 5900X are also interesting options. These are six-core and 12-core processors, respectively, perfect for tasks that use all the cores and threads they can get.
If you're spending a few hundred dollars each on your processor and graphics card, then maybe now is the time to upgrade your monitor - for example, going from a 60Hz 1080p panel to 165Hz 1440p screen, or something in the 4K range. With higher native resolution on your panel, the frame rate difference between an AMD Ryzen chip and a later model Intel Core is almost certain to narrow. ( See our current favorite gaming monitors .)
Below you will find more details on thebest AMD and Intel processors for gaming PCs, plus links to full reviews. If you're building a new system from scratch you'll also want to take a look at our recommendations for the best target M.2 SSD and tower cases for PC . Or, if you'd rather buy a balanced standard model, you can check out our favorite gaming desks also.